The future of competitive mountain biking (MTB) seems to be undergoing a phase of profound transformation, characterized by a series of changes proposed by Warner Bros Discovery (WBD), which aim to make this sport more regulated and structured, bringing it closer to the models of other already mature competitive disciplines such as MotoGP or road cycling. However, these changes could lead to a cultural revolution that will impact the very essence of MTB as an accessible sport open to many levels of participation.
DH qualifications change
One of the most controversial changes concerns the removal of traditional qualifications in the Downhill. The introduction of a system that provides a qualification for the first 20 places and a “last chance” for the next 10 places could penalize high-level riders who, for some reason, fail to qualify. This change risks generating uncertainty among the top teams, as the possibility of a premature exit could also have negative repercussions on sponsorship plans.
100 MM in Xc…?? No thanks
From the draft of the new regulation it seems that they want to reduce the travel of XC and Enduro bikes. More precisely with a limit of 100mm for XC and 160 for Enduro.
MTB has always been the testing ground for innovation in the entire two-wheel system. Often, innovative components are born in the minds of off-road designers and are later adopted on the road, just think of disc brakes.
Adding limitations to the travel is an element that distorts the very essence of fat tires.
We are used to seeing the UCI intervene to technically regulate the road world, but in that case, this is always done in the name of safety. Reducing the travel of MTBs to 100 mm, in addition to generating production problems within companies, goes in the opposite direction. It would be necessary to have an independent commission made up of experts in the sector to approve the tracks, it could be useful to insert a weight limit as is done for road bikes, without however stopping the evolution and research, which in recent years has led to having fun XC bikes suitable for a wider audience
Introduction of custom rider numbers
The idea of assigning personalized numbers to riders could represent a positive element for the construction of an iconic identity for the riders, as already happened in MotoGP with the 46 by Valentino Rossi or in motocross with the 222 by Tony Cairoli. This move can help create a more exciting and engaging narrative for fans, without distorting the spirit of MTB.
Restriction of Teams Participating in the World Series
The 20-team limit for XC and DH competitions, with wild cards, is one of the most significant changes. This narrowing of the field will lead to a more rigid selection, but could ensure a higher quality of racing, more similar to the models of other top-level sports. However, reducing the number of teams could penalize second-tier teams and emerging riders, who may see their opportunities for growth limited.
Reorganization of the continental championships
One possible solution could be to increase the growing importance of continental championships, which already from this draft would seem to be the main route to access the World Cup races. This approach could create a sort of competitive “pyramid”, where riders and teams could go through intermediate stages before reaching the world elite. However, this model will require greater attention from national federations, which will have to support athletes and teams in this transition.
Longer timetables and cost impacts
The increase in the number of races, aimed at ensuring greater media exposure, could benefit sponsors, but at the same time increase logistical and organizational costs, which not all teams could sustain. Also from a physical point of view, riders, especially in gravity disciplines, could suffer from a greater load of races, with consequent impacts on their performance and physical preparation.
Conclusions
The entry of WBD and the regulatory changes represent an evolution of MTB towards greater professionalization and structure. However, this revolution could partly distort the essence of a sport that has always been more accessible than other competitive disciplines. If on the one hand we are trying to bring MTB to a level of maturity similar to other sports, on the other it will be crucial that federations and organizing bodies support smaller teams and emerging riders, creating solid and mediatically relevant continental circuits. Only in this way will it be possible to guarantee inclusive growth of the entire movement and not just the world elite.
The aim of these changes should be to keep MTB innovation and accessibility alive, while ensuring high-level, balanced and media-friendly competition.
