Connect with us

CONTACT US (editorial board)

365mountain bikes

Insights

MTB and social media: are we riders or content?

The role of MTB riders has changed profoundly: today they are no longer just athletes, but also active communicators on social media. This evolution has increased visibility and opportunities, but has also introduced new dynamics that impact authenticity and credibility.

When content production becomes central, the risk is that the experience is bent to the needs of communication, with trails and situations chosen more for the visual effect than for the real value of the ridingIn these cases, the content may appear constructed and lose authenticity in the eyes of the public.

To maintain credibility in MTB communications, it's essential to distinguish roles: the rider interprets and performs, while sporting results and the media contribute to building a more authoritative narrative. Only through this balance between performance, content, and external narrative can trust and value be maintained over time.

MTB Biker
MTB Biker

From athlete to communicator: a new balance

Today riders are no longer just athletes.
They are also communicators.

They produce content, manage channels, build a direct presence.
This has opened up important opportunities: more visibility, more autonomy, more opportunities to tell one's story.

But it also introduced a new pressure.

👉 Performance is no longer enough.
👉 You have to be there, always.

The risk is that communication ceases to be a consequence of experience
and you become a target.

When you choose a trail for the content it can generate—and not for the sensations it gives—something changes.

👉 Content becomes constructed.
👉 And what is built, over time, loses authenticity.


When content takes the place of experience

In the MTB world, this transition is particularly evident.

Releases designed to be filmed, lines chosen for visual effect, moments built to work on social media.

All correct, but not always true.

👉 The problem isn't making content.
👉 The problem is when the experience is bent to the content.

Because that's where the balance breaks down.

The public — even without realizing it — perceives this difference:
between something that has been experienced
and something that was built to be displayed.

And in the medium term, this difference affects credibility.


Credibility and roles: the limit of self-referentiality

There is then another aspect, even more delicate, which I explored in depth in the interview with Alberto from RITM Agency

Today, riders communicate directly, but that doesn't mean they have to tell everything themselves.

The risk is self-referentiality.

When a rider:

  • talks about his performances
  • promotes himself
  • builds a closed narrative

the message tends to weaken.

Not because it's false,
but because there is no distance.

In the MTB system, roles still have a precise value:

  • the rider lives and interprets
  • sports results are the measure
  • the media tell and contextualize

It is this balance that builds credibility.

It's not the rider who has to say how strong he is.
The results and the external story consolidate it.



Written by

ppgad@pucrs.br Mountain bike travel editor and expert. Chiropractor and personal trainer, for years following some of the strongest national interpreters of enduro mtb.

CORRELATED ARTICLES

Lakes and Mountains: My Journey into the Soul of the VCO

Insights

pogno_58 pogno_58

MTB Events: Why Many Races Work… But Don't Build Anything

Insights

Bike Destination MTB: The Mistake Some Places Make

Insights

advertisement
Connect